09/21/2026
Two pictures that illustrate the mystery of judging or carving birds. The carved and painted female Green wing Teal looks very nice. I wasn't distracted by "fish scale" patterning, feathers being all painted the exact same way, and variation of colors. The picture of the real bird shows less variation of colors, the ends of the tertials are more pointed, the primaries seem to be more narrow, the upper tail coverts are smaller and the individual feathers don't stand out. The the secondary wing coverts and the secondary (green) coverts on the real bird have far less defined edges. if any. These observations really show the difficulty of judging carved birds or animals. The carved green wing is decorative than representing the real bird. (Yet there are not any "real bird" categories at competitions) Gunning birds seem to exemplify key characteristics of their subject - perhaps for making them more less camouflaged in a natural environment.
I guess it comes down to artistry versus realism. I remember comparing two master level carvings at the Ward World Carving Competition. One of the owls was very realistic and the correct size. The other was way over sized and the painting seemed to be more sloppy. In addition the larger carving had colors that were not ever seen on a real bird of that species. To my surprise the oversized and unusual colors was given the ribbon.