What are the opening hours?

Monday 8am - 4pm Tuesday 8am - 4pm Wednesday 8am - 4pm Thursday 8am - 4pm Friday 8am - 4pm

Ames Plantation History and Heritage, 4275 Buford Ellington Road, Grand Junction, TN (2026)

10/07/2026

Where Fayette County Began: The Robert G. Thornton House and the Birth of a New County

When Fayette County was established in 1824, West Tennessee was still frontier country. Thick forests covered the landscape, roads were few, and scattered settlers were only beginning to establish permanent homes. Yet within this developing wilderness, a handful of pioneers gathered to create the county government that would shape the region for generations. Compelling evidence suggests this historic moment may have occurred on land that would later become part of Ames Plantation.

From the Chickasaw Cession to a New County

The land that would eventually become Fayette County was originally part of the Chickasaw Cession, often called the Jackson Purchase of 1818. Following the acquisition of these lands, settlers gradually moved into the region and established farms and homesteads. Before Fayette County existed, neighboring counties administered the area. Shelby County, organized in 1819, governed much of the western portion of the territory, while Hardeman County, established in 1823, administered land to the east. As early settlers entered the wilderness around present-day Ames Plantation, they relied upon Shelby County to record deeds, settle legal disputes, and conduct official business. As the population grew, the need for a separate county government became increasingly apparent. On September 28, 1824, the Tennessee General Assembly created Fayette County and named it in honor of the Marquis de Lafayette, the French aristocrat and military officer whose support proved instrumental during the American Revolution. Lafayette served under George Washington in the Continental Army, rose to the rank of major general, and played a key role in the campaign that culminated in the British surrender at Yorktown in 1781. By the 1820s, he was among the most admired figures in the United States, and communities nationwide honored him by naming counties, towns, and other landmarks in his memory. Coincidentally, Fayette County was established during Lafayette's celebrated tour of the United States in 1824, during which he visited both Nashville and Memphis (Wikipedia).

The First Court Session

The act establishing Fayette County did more than create a new county. It also provided instructions for organizing its government. The legislation directed that the first sessions of the Court of Pleas and Quarter Sessions and the Circuit Court be held in Robert G. Thornton's dwelling house until a permanent county seat could be selected and a courthouse constructed (Tennessee Private Acts of 1824, Chapter 36). Accordingly, on December 6, 1824, Fayette County's first court convened in Thornton's home. The county's earliest surviving court minutes record the presence of Robert G. Thornton, Henry Kirk, Henry M. Johnson, Daniel Johnson, William Owen, Edmond D. Tarver, Lawrence G. Evans, David Jernigan, Daniel Clifft, William Ramsey, and John T. Patterson. Having taken the prescribed oaths before John H. Bills, a justice of the peace from Hardeman County, these men officially entered upon the duties of their offices and began the work of organizing the county government (Fayette County Minute Book A, 1824-1829). With that meeting, Fayette County officially came to life.

Several of the men present, including Robert G. Thornton, Daniel Johnson, William Owen, David Jernigan, Daniel Clifft, and John T. Patterson, were among the earliest settlers on property that would later become part of Ames Plantation. Their participation shows the important role early Ames residents played in founding and developing Fayette County.

Choosing a County Seat

Among the court's first responsibilities was choosing a permanent seat of government. According to The Goodspeed Histories of Fayette and Hardeman Counties of Tennessee, the Tennessee Legislature appointed Benjamin Reynolds, Robert Jetton, James Fentress, and William Martin as commissioners to locate the county seat. Their efforts ultimately led to selecting the land where the town of Somerville now stands. The first court session held in Somerville occurred during the November Term of 1825. The county's first courthouse was humble. The History of Fayette County (1986) describes it as a one-story log building measuring approximately twenty feet square. The same publication includes an 1888 interview with early resident John R. Hendon, who recalled arriving in Fayette County in 1831 and finding "the old courthouse" to be little more than a log hut with no floor. Rough benches rested upon stakes driven directly into the earth. Such descriptions remind us how modest the beginnings of local government really were on the Tennessee frontier.

Robert G. Thornton and Ames Plantation

The connection between Fayette County's founding and Ames Plantation hinges upon one important question: Where was Robert G. Thornton living when the first court convened in December 1824? If Thornton's home stood on land that later became Ames Plantation, then one of the most significant events in Fayette County's early history occurred there.

Robert G. Thornton was born in 1761 on the island of St. Croix. During his lifetime, he lived in North Carolina, Virginia, and eventually Tennessee. Before settling in Fayette County, he had also resided in Maury County, Tennessee. Thornton appears to have been among the earliest settlers in what became Fayette County, possibly arriving as early as 1820. On May 30, 1821, he filed Land Entry No. 209 for 261 acres situated on the waters of the North Fork of the Wolf River. Much of this acreage would later become part of Ames Plantation.

An additional transaction is especially important to the story. On August 7, 1826, Thornton purchased sixty acres from Ralph Graves. The deed included a revealing description, stating that the tract encompassed "the spring place whereon the said Thornton now lives." This language confirms that Thornton resided on the property by 1826. The tract had originally been granted to Ralph Graves in 1822. Consequently, Thornton appears to have occupied the property before formally purchasing it. Evidence suggests that this circumstance may have stemmed from family and social connections. Three of Thornton's daughters married members of the Graves family, all thought to be related to Ralph Graves. Additionally, both the Graves and Thornton families had previously lived in Giles County, Tennessee, before migrating to Fayette County.

Given these connections, it is easy to imagine that Thornton may have occupied the land under an informal agreement with Graves, making improvements and constructing a home until ownership could be formally transferred. Although no written agreement has been located, the circumstances make such an arrangement plausible.

The Search for Thornton's Home Site

The 1826 deed provides another critical clue by identifying Thornton's residence as the "spring place." A careful examination of the property reveals a long-established rock-lined spring located at the transition between the uplands and the Wolf River floodplain. Approximately 200 feet upslope are the remains of an early homesite, including a chimney and fireplace constructed from handmade brick. (see map in photos)

Researchers have identified no additional early house sites on the tract. Combined with the deed description, the physical evidence strongly suggests that this was the location of Thornton's residence. If correct, the site occupies a unique place in Fayette County history.

The Birthplace of Fayette County?

The evidence presents a fascinating possibility. We know that Fayette County's first court session was held in Robert G. Thornton's home on December 6, 1824. We know that Thornton later lived on land that became part of Ames Plantation. Both documentary and physical evidence point to a specific homesite associated with his residence. What remains uncertain is whether Thornton was already residing at that exact location in December 1824. If he was, then Fayette County's first court session and the formal beginning of county government took place on land now associated with Ames Plantation. If not, the event almost certainly took place nearby.

More than two centuries later, the available evidence may never allow a definitive answer. Yet the surviving court records, legislative acts, land transactions, family connections, and archaeological remains together make a compelling case. History seldom provides complete certainty. Instead, it leaves fragments from which we attempt to reconstruct the past. In the case of Robert G. Thornton and the founding of Fayette County, those fragments suggest that on a cold December morning in 1824, a group of frontier leaders may have gathered around the hearth of a home that stood on what would later become Ames Plantation and there took the first official steps in creating the government of Fayette County, Tennessee.

Sources
Fayette County Minute Book A, 1824-1829, First Court Session Minutes, December 6, 1824.

Tennessee General Assembly, Private Acts of 1824, Chapter 36. Available through the County Technical Assistance Service (CTAS), University of Tennessee: Acts of 1824, Chapter 36.

The Goodspeed Histories of Fayette and Hardeman Counties of Tennessee. Goodspeed Publishing Company.

The History of Fayette County (1986). Fayette County Historical Society

Wikipedia contributors, "Fayette County, Tennessee" and "Gilbert du Motier, Marquis de Lafayette."

Fayette County land records, including:
Land Entry No. 209 filed by Robert G. Thornton, May 30, 1821. Fayette County, Tennessee, Entry Book B, pg. 5
Deed from Ralph Graves to Robert G. Thornton, August 7, 1826. Fayette County, Tennessee, Deed Book A, pg. 47

Ames Plantation historical and archaeological investigations of the Thornton homesite and associated spring location.

09/20/2026

The Role of an Overseer on Antebellum Plantations: Understanding Slavery Through the Eyes of Those Who Enforced It

We recently discovered a document entitled “Biennial Report of the State Agricultural Bureau of Tennessee to the Legislature of 1855-56”. We found the material fascinating because it covers a wide range of agricultural topics, including farm management practices, erosion control, equipment, crops, market prices, slave management, and reports from county Agricultural and Mechanical Society meetings.

Among the most compelling sections were excerpts from meetings of the Fayette County Agricultural and Mechanical Society. During these gatherings, members presented essays addressing agricultural issues facing local farmers and planters. One such essay, written by Fayette County resident James C. Lusby, was entitled “A Few Hints in Regard to the Duties of an Overseer and His Employer”.

What makes Lusby's essay particularly valuable is that it allows us to examine slavery through the perspective of an overseer, the individual responsible for implementing a plantation owner's policies and controlling the daily lives of enslaved people. While much historical attention rightly focuses on the experiences of the enslaved and the actions of plantation owners, overseers occupied a critical position between the two. They served as the day-to-day managers of the slave system, translating a slaveholder's economic goals into the realities experienced by those held in bo***ge.

Historical records indicate that Lusby worked as an overseer in Fayette County in 1850 and owned five enslaved individuals himself. He appears to fit the profile of a typical overseer. At age 31, he owned no real property and likely worked for wages rather than from inherited wealth. Overseers generally occupied the lower-to-middle levels of the Southern social and economic hierarchy. Many lived in housing provided by their employers near slave quarters and fields. The position often carried significant stress, as overseers were expected to satisfy plantation owners while maintaining control over large enslaved workforces.

Like many overseers, Lusby may have viewed the role as a stepping stone toward becoming an independent farmer. By 1860, he operated his own farming enterprise, producing 35 bales of cotton and maintaining substantial livestock holdings. Eight enslaved individuals were present on his property, although evidence suggests he may have been renting rather than owning the land he farmed. While Lusby did not work directly near the Ames landholdings, he represents the many overseers who appear throughout the Fayette County census records of 1850 and 1860.

The overseer's role is often portrayed in popular culture primarily as that of an enforcer. Lusby's essay confirms that discipline and control were important aspects of the job, but it also demonstrates that the overseer's responsibilities extended much further. He discusses the personal qualities he believed an overseer should possess, the relationship between overseer and employer, methods of managing labor, and expectations concerning the treatment, productivity, and behavior of enslaved people.

For historians and descendants alike, documents such as this are important because they help explain how slavery functioned in practice. The overseer stood at the point where policy became reality. Through his decisions, instructions, and actions, every aspect of plantation life was affected, including work schedules, food distribution, punishment, family life, movement, and daily living conditions. By studying the words of an overseer, we gain insight into the mechanisms that sustained slavery and the individuals who carried out its day-to-day operation.

The essay contains disturbing descriptions of slavery and includes language common in 1855 that is offensive and unacceptable today. We present it not to validate the views expressed, but to better understand the institution of slavery and the system of control that shaped the lives of thousands of enslaved men, women, and children across the Ames landscape. Examining slavery through the eyes of an overseer helps reveal not only how the system operated, but also how deeply it affected every aspect of the lives of those subjected to it.

To access the essay, please open the three accompanying images labeled Pages 1-3.

09/09/2026

Willis & Lucy Person Family History

Willis Person was born in North Carolina in 1794, the son of Jesse Person and Amabel Rush Perry. At 18, he served as a private in the War of 1812 with Captain Allen’s Company of the North Carolina Militia. Like many young men of his time, Willis likely grew up in a plantation environment—both his father and grandfather were slave owners and farmers.

In 1826, 32-year-old Willis married 18-year-old Lucy A. Jones, daughter of Amos W. Jones and Mary Myrick. They built their home in Franklin County, NC, where both were likely born and raised. By 1830, their household included Willis, Lucy, and an elderly woman—likely one of their mothers. The Persons enslaved 15 individuals and almost certainly farmed for their livelihood.

By 1834, Willis and Lucy had moved to Hardeman County, Tennessee. The reason becomes clearer when considering the broader family: two of Willis’s uncles, Joseph and Henry Person, had already settled in nearby Fayette County. Joseph acquired land west of what is now Ames in 1831 and 1833, and Henry was also in the county. Their experiences likely drew Willis westward. Ironically, both uncles later moved to Carroll County, Mississippi, while Willis remained in Tennessee.

Willis and Lucy settled on land stretching from the eastern Agronomy Unit to the Prospect Church area of Ames. Many of you who ride the afternoon field trial course pass within 100 yards of the old Person homestead as you cross Marshall’s Jack Harris field. Between 1834 and 1847, Willis steadily expanded his holdings, purchasing four adjoining parcels totaling 351 acres. In 1847, the same year as his final purchase, he sold 29 acres to Burwell Whitmore—land known today as Sam’s Field.

Their family grew in 1839 with the birth of their daughter, Mary—their only child. In 1844, Lucy’s sister Harriet and her husband, Samuel Pegram, joined them in the area, purchasing 125 acres about a mile south of the Person farm. Samuel's property is now known as the southern half of the old Ames dairy, and extended westward to Cox's Ridge. In 1849, Lucy’s brother, Amos W. Jones, bought land between the Pegram and Person farms, though he never moved there. Jones' property is now known as the northern half of the old Ames dairy. He later sold the parcel to Samuel Pegram in 1857, after Willis had left the area.

By 1850, Willis was actively farming 250 acres of improved land. His farm produced 33 bales of cotton, 1,250 bushels of corn, and other staple crops, and it supported 20 cattle and 55 hogs. The census also lists him as a Methodist minister—he may have preached at Andrew’s Chapel Methodist Church. At this time, he enslaved 14 people.

Tragedy struck in the summer of 1852 when Lucy died on August 4th. She was buried near their home, and her gravestone remains a touching memorial to one of Ames’s earliest residents. Mary was only 13. Likely driven by grief, Willis sold his Hardeman County farm in December 1855 to neighbor N. A. D. Bryant, excluding the family burial ground.

Willis next appears living in Fayette County near Moscow. In the 1860 general, agricultural, and slave censuses, he is 65, living alone, still farming, and now enslaving 23 individuals. His estate was valued at $25,000—a sign of considerable success. No evidence shows he continued his Methodist ministry.

No records have been found thus far that name any of the enslaved individuals Willis owned, nor do we know where those who died were buried. These enslaved African Americans are among the thousands who contributed to the history of Ames, yet they may never be recognized by name.

In 1864, Willis married Polly Ann Craig, who was 39. Willis was 70. The story grows complicated in the 1870 census, where his wife appears not as Polly Ann but as “Mary,” age 45. Evidence strongly suggests Polly Ann and Mary are the same person: Thomas Craig’s 1875 will lists “Mary Person” as his daughter, matching the age of the woman in Willis’s household. Earlier censuses list Thomas Craig’s daughter as Polly Ann. This is one of those classic genealogical puzzles—names shifting across records for reasons we may never know.

By 1870, Willis was 76 and living with his wife, Mary/Polly Ann. The next record is the 1880 census, which lists Mary as widowed. Willis had died sometime between 1870 and 1880, though no burial site has been found. Mary disappears from the record after 1880.

The Person family story ends with many details uncovered and many mysteries still lingering. When I pass the collapsed chimney and impressive display of daffodils marking the old Person homestead, I think about the lives—free and enslaved—who shaped this land. Their presence is still felt in the soil, the history, and the legacy of what we now call Ames.

08/31/2026

Forestry Students Receive a History Lesson at Ames

This summer, under the direction of Dr. Allan Houston, UT School of Natural Resources students are spending two weeks at Ames Plantation for an intensive forestry course focused on silviculture, field data collection, timber assessment, and forest management planning.

Over decades, UT’s “Forestry Camp” has brought hundreds of students to the Ames forest for hands-on learning. But one important part of their experience goes beyond trees, timber, and management plans. During their stay, students also spend a day learning about the cultural landscape of Ames — the historic house sites, cemeteries, roadways, land records, family histories, and traces of past activity that remain woven into the land.

For many of these students, future careers may place them in land management roles where their decisions can affect historic places and cultural resources. That is why it is so important for them to understand that landscapes are not only natural systems, but also historical records.

The day begins in the classroom with Ames historian Jamie Evans for a discussion about why preserving our shared heritage matters. Students learn how to research land history, trace ownership records, identify early residents, and connect family histories to specific places. Then they head into the fields and forests of Ames for an exercise in “reading the cultural landscape.” With a trained eye, the remnants of earlier lives and communities begin to appear — old home sites, cemeteries, roadways, and other evidence of human activity that shaped the land over the past 200 years.

Our goal is to help students see the natural landscape with fresh eyes and recognize that responsible land management entails protecting both natural resources and cultural heritage. We hope they carry that awareness into their future careers, wherever those paths may lead.

08/19/2026

Ames History in Photos

Ames has a sizable collection of photos taken at the Plantation in the first half of the 20th century. We plan to share a few of these images occasionally as a visual reminder of how much things have changed at Ames over the past century. We hope you enjoy these first few pictures. To add a bit of realism, we are posting both the original images and their colorized and restored versions.

For context, these photos of the annual “hog killing” were taken in the early 1950s. There were many mouths to feed at Ames back then. Leon Dixon, a University of Tennessee student and an Ames resident at the time, surveyed Ames residents in 1954. His work found that 91 families, including 416 Blacks and 65 whites, lived in Ames that year. These families included both sharecroppers and employees.

These photos were taken during a pivotal period at Ames, shortly after Julia Ames's death in 1950 and in the early years of Ames's development as a University of Tennessee research facility. Many of these individuals had worked at the Plantation during Hobart Ames’s lifetime as wage hands or sharecroppers. During that era, large numbers of hogs were slaughtered each year, and the meat was distributed to the Plantation’s residents throughout the year. These photos suggest that this tradition continued into the early years of UT’s involvement. This practice likely ended shortly after these photos were taken, in the early 1950s, as the sharecropping tradition at Ames came to an end. We will shed more light on this transition in future posts.

Based on earlier interviews with some of the Ames residents from that era, the hog killing usually took place on the Hancock Place in the area known today as “The Old Well Pasture.” We cannot identify specific individuals in the photos, but we know they include Ganos Scott, Willis Govan, Thurston Faison, Ben Lewis, Garfield Wade, Charley Walton, Jimmy Bryan, Joseph (Ham) Lewis, Richard Goddard, and Jim Harris. If any of our followers can add to this story, we would appreciate their thoughts.

08/13/2026

The Story of Those Enslaved by the Putney Family

Our most recent post focused on the slave‑owning Putney family, but it did not yet tell the stories of the people they enslaved. That absence matters. Whenever we share the history of a family who built their lives, land, and status through slavery, we must also tell the stories of those whose labor made that history possible. The enslaved were not side notes in someone else’s family story—they were central to it.

They had lives, hopes, relationships, struggles, and dreams of their own. Yet the historical record rarely treated them as human beings. Enslaved people were documented as property, their names omitted, their families separated, and their identities reduced to ages, genders, and monetary values. Marriages went unrecorded. Children were sold away. Burials were left unmarked. The gaps in their stories were created deliberately—and that is why filling them matters.

Every name recovered, every relationship identified, and every life remembered helps restore dignity to people whose humanity was intentionally ignored. Their stories are not missing because they were unimportant. They are missing because someone chose not to write them down. It is our responsibility to tell the rest of the story.

Recent research into the Putney family has revealed more about the individuals they enslaved, beginning before the family left North Carolina for Fayette County. The 1819 will of Richard Putney names five people—Allen, Sarah, Patience, Jesse, and Ellin—given to his wife, Sarah. The remainder of his enslaved people were to be divided among his children, though unnamed. Some of these individuals likely traveled with the Putneys to Tennessee.

David Putney’s 1847 will names four more individuals—Manuel, F***y, Jack, and Ann—whom he “loaned” to his wife, Elizabeth. He directed that the rest of his enslaved people be hired out, again without naming them.

By 1850, the Fayette County Slave Schedule lists 24 people enslaved by David’s eldest son, John B. Putney, who had assumed the role of head of household after the death of his mother in that year: 15 males and 9 females, ranging in age from two to sixty. Their names were not recorded—only their ages, genders, and race.

One of the most revealing documents is an 1853 settlement statement detailing the hiring out of David’s enslaved people by Joel L. Pulliam, guardian of the Putney children after the deaths of both parents. This record lists 25 individuals by name—Bob, Wyatt, Manuel, Sally, John, Jim Henry, Diamond, Ellen, Ann, Jenny, Eliza, Caroline, Cassisus, Isaiah, Jack, Ben, Henry, Tom, Lewis (noted as a “simpleton”), and Mary and her four children—along with the people to whom they were hired and the payments for their labor. One name was illegible. Unfortunately, we cannot match these names to the ages recorded in the 1850 census, leaving their individual life stories incomplete.

After 1855, the trail grows faint. The Putney children had moved to Texas by 1860, where some remained into the early 1900s. What happened to the enslaved people is even less certain. They may have been taken to Texas, but no evidence supports this. More likely, they were sold—either locally or possibly at the Memphis slave market—for the benefit of the Putney heirs.

This story reflects the challenges of recovering the lives of the enslaved. Yet every name we uncover is a step toward restoring what was taken from them: recognition, identity, and humanity. We celebrate each discovery and remain committed to bringing their stories to light, knowing there is always more to learn—and more to honor.

07/30/2026

The Putney Family - One of Ames' Most Interesting Stories

Some families leave only faint traces in the historical record. The Putneys, however, left a story — one woven with hope, hardship, resilience, and the quiet strength that carried so many early Ames settlers through their most difficult years. After years of talking with Putney descendants across the country and digging through old records, letters, and land deeds, we’ve come to know this family more intimately than almost any other. Their story reminds us that the land we walk today was once the backdrop for lives full of courage, loss, and determination, and in the case of the enslaved, hope for freedom.

A Journey West
In the mid 1820s, a small group of Putneys and Ingrams left Northampton County, North Carolina, carrying with them little more than their belongings and their faith in a better future. David Putney, his sister Caroline, her husband William Ingram, and several relatives traveled west to Fayette County, settling on 50 acres along Bear Creek. Both of David’s parents had recently died, and the family sold their inherited land back home. It was time to begin anew. They arrived during a period of great movement — when families from the Carolinas and other points east poured into the “Western District,” drawn by cheap land and the promise of rich, fertile soil. The Putneys were among those dreamers, hoping the red clay of North Carolina could be exchanged for the dark, productive soil of West Tennessee.

A New Home, A New Family
David remained single until 1831, when he married Elizabeth Harris, a young woman whose brother, William C. Harris, already owned land on Ames. In 1836, they purchased 300 acres near her brother’s farm. Soon, three families — Putneys, Harrises, and Ingrams — lived side by side, bound by kinship and shared hope.
When David and Elizabeth moved onto their land, they brought with them two little boys, Richard and John. A third son, Robert, was born soon after. Eight enslaved African Americans who likely made the journey from North Carolina with the family also lived and labored on the farm — people whose stories we are working to recover and honor in a future post. The land had never been occupied before, and the Putneys began the hard work of turning wilderness into home. By the early 1840s, three more children had been born, making six in all. Elizabeth’s elderly mother, Mary Harris, lived with them too. Their household was full — full of noise, full of work, full of life.

A Decade of Loss
But the years between 1837 and 1847 brought heartbreak after heartbreak. In 1837, David’s brother-in-law William Ingram died, leaving Caroline with three young children. Five years later, Caroline passed away, and David became guardian of her children. In 1845, Elizabeth’s brother William C. Harris died, leaving her a widow with several children. And then, in August of 1847, tragedy struck the Putney home. David died, leaving Elizabeth pregnant and responsible for six children between the ages of four and fifteen. His will, written shortly before his death, described him as “sound in mind but weak in body.” He knew the end was near. He was buried at the nearby Andrews Chapel Cemetery, where he served as a trustee. Elizabeth carried on as best she could. But grief, responsibility, and illness weighed heavily. In June 1850, just three years after losing her husband, Elizabeth died of tuberculosis at only 38 years old. She was almost certainly buried beside David at Andrew’s Chapel. A quiet depression in the earth next to his stone marks the place where she likely rests.

Children Left to Shoulder the Burden
The 1850 census tells a sobering story: 18 year old John B. Putney listed as head of household, responsible for six younger siblings, his 84 year old grandmother, and the family farm. It is hard to imagine the weight on his shoulders. In 1853, a guardian — Joel L. Pulliam — was appointed for the younger children. By that time, John was 22 years old and may have been starting his own family. And by 1860, the Putney children had left Fayette County entirely. Evidence suggests John may have returned to North Carolina, while the younger siblings moved to Colorado County, Texas, where other relatives may have already moved. The Putney farm, once so full of life, slowly emptied. Eventually other families would try their hand at success on this same land.

The Ames Landscape and Legacy
Many of our followers are field trailers, and you may not realize that when you ride the morning course — from the moment you cross Buford Ellington Road near the breakaway until you cross Turner Road — you are traveling across the land the Putneys once called home. Their farm stretched from National Championship Drive on the north to Buford Ellington Road on the east and Turner Road on the west. There is more to that landscape than quail. There are echoes of children’s voices, the rhythm of farm work, the struggles of the enslaved, the weight of loss, and the quiet courage of a family who tried, again and again, to build a life here.

Soon, we’ll share what we’ve learned about the enslaved individuals who lived and worked on the Putney farm — people whose stories deserve to be told with the same care.

We might note that a more detailed accounting of this and other family histories posted here, complete with source citations, will be included in a book currently in the works. Stay tuned.

Ames Plantation History and Heritage

10/07/2026

09/20/2026

09/09/2026

08/31/2026

08/19/2026

08/13/2026

07/30/2026

Address

Opening Hours

Telephone

Website

Alerts

Contact The Museum

Shortcuts

Share

Category

Listing takedown request

Monday	8am - 4pm
Tuesday	8am - 4pm
Wednesday	8am - 4pm
Thursday	8am - 4pm
Friday	8am - 4pm